Shogo Sanada vs Taisei Ichikawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Nov at 09:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Sanada vs T. Ichikawa

JPN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

JPN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Sanada 0 - 1 Ichikawa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Shogo Sanada winning 0 and Taisei Ichikawa winning 2. The last match between Taisei Ichikawa and Shogo Sanada was at the Yokohama Challenger, 16-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Taisei Ichikawa getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sanada | 0 |
| Ichikawa | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Yokohama Challenger(11-16-25)
S. Sanada vs T. Ichikawa H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0.00% (0-3) | Career Total W/L | 50.57% (133-130) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Sanada vs T. Ichikawa Match Preview:
- What is the recent trend for second serve points won? Shogo Sanada has not won any points, while Taisei Ichikawa has a rate of 41.08%.
- How do these players perform in return games? Sanada has secured 0% on return of second serves, while Ichikawa has achieved 44.08%.
- In terms of first serve returns, what are the statistics? Sanada again at 0%, and Ichikawa stands at 24.47%.
- How effective are these players at saving breakpoints? Sanada has saved 0%, whereas Ichikawa has shown a higher capability at 56.97%.
- In the past year, what is the match-winning rate comparison? Sanada has a record of 0%, contrasting with Ichikawa’s 47.92%.
- Which surface is their best in terms of career win percentage? Both have their best results on clay, though Sanada has won 0% of such matches.
- Comparing experience based on tournament levels, where have they each competed? Sanada has played no matches, while Ichikawa competed mostly in ITF tournaments, winning 46.15%.
- How do the opponent quality stats measure up? Sanada has faced no ranked opponents compared to Ichikawa’s average of 382.04.
- When faced with a deciding set, what is each player’s win percentage? Sanada has won 0%, whereas Ichikawa’s success rate is 47%.
- Analyzing breakpoint conversion rates, what do recent forms indicate? Sanada has converted 0%, contrasting sharply with Ichikawa’s 26.09% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (November 15, 2025, UTC):
In examining recent performance trends, Taisei Ichikawa displays a notable edge in several key statistical areas. His ability to secure points on both his and his opponent's second serve outmatches Shogo Sanada significantly.
Ichikawa's prowess in saving breakpoints and converting them when given the chance further underscores his potential dominance in the upcoming match. Meanwhile, Sanada's match win percentage over the past year remains non-existent, indicating a lack of competitive play.
Given Ichikawa's consistent participation in the ITF circuit and his capacity to perform under pressure, he clearly appears to be the superior player in this matchup. Therefore, Taisei Ichikawa is projected to win the upcoming tennis match against Shogo Sanada.
Shogo Sanada vs Taisei Ichikawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Sanada vs T. Ichikawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Sanada Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
T. Ichikawa Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||

S. Sanada vs T. Ichikawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.00% (0/3) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.38% (132/130) |
| 0.00% (0/6) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.33% (308/292) |
| 34.55% (19/36) | Games Win/Loss | 50.43% (2879/2830) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.75% (98/99) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.85% (21/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (13/13) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 3 | Aces Total | 583 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 634 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:27:59 |
| 667.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.07 |
| 55% (63/114) | 1st Serve % | 64% (9887/15532) |
| 56% (35/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (6515/9887) |
| 41% (21/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2763/5645) |
| 30% (3/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (641/1567) |
| 33% (34/103) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6280/15702) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (116/116) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (127/256) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (38/70) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (32/81) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (135/112) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (135/22) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (126/17) |